I recently attended a course of Islamic Financial Products held by BNM.
One of the speakers, taking the easy way (at least I think) of answering questions from the audience on the concept of Islamic products simply responded by saying;
‘Alaa..basically all of these products are not different from other conventional products, except for the name we put for it and the concept used. In terms of its cost and reward, it would not be so much in different with the conventional products’
I don’t really know where did he get this idea in tackling the question, especially he is currently working with one of the biggest Islamic banks in the country.
What make thing worse was the fact that his statement might make others, especially non muslim to perceive that Islamic products are no different than other conventional products, except for the arabic names, and some little twist in the concept. Although this is basically true in our current profit-maximising-confined-context of Islamic Banking system, I would dare to say that his approach was rather not wise.
Instead of putting Islamic Banking products in the same bucket as conventional banking products, wouldn’t it be better for the speaker to talk on the superiority of Islamic products instead?
This is one example of our typical mistakes. As we live in a multi religions and races community, undeniably we will have to tolerate with each others and give equally unequivocal freedom in practicing religious obligation. However, sometimes in the dire needs to achieve this, we tend to equalise Islam with others by putting other religion at par with Islam, when in fact the latter is far more superior than the former.
We have to be able to differentiate these two approaches. Giving freedom in practicing whatever religion embraced by the citizen is required by Islamic teaching, while equalising Islam with others is completely not right, and in fact it can nullify one’s shahadah.
Remember, Islam is the highest above all, and no other religion above it.
